![]() Drawing on interviews, we examine the way in which hook-up apps are ‘house-trained’. 2) in non-monogamous gay male relationships. In this chapter, we interrogate the process of domesticating ‘“strange” and “wild” technologies’ (Berker et al., 2005, p. At a time when marriage and monogamy are increasingly monopolising the public discourse of gay life, digital devices are affording novel ways of arranging sex, intimacy, and sexual community with their own qualities and limitations. My analysis prompts a series of methodological reflections wrought from the encounter it stages between queer theory and Science and Technology Studies. Understanding this dynamic – its typical forms of connection and estrangement – is pivotal for grasping the emergence of new forms of sexual community and new sexual publics among gay men – and/or “un-community”, as some have put it. ![]() These frames are variously rejected, reconfigured, re-embedded or confounded by participants they become subject to various forms of overflowing. ![]() Though not without precedent, online hook-up devices generally act in gay culture as “framing devices”, framing sex as a “no-strings” encounter via their default application. This paper considers how certain functions of online hook-up devices are participating in the emergence of new forms of sexual relation, new distributions of intimacy and new sexual arrangements.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |